On Friday, my husband and I drove to Ventura to shop at our favorite garden center. On the way, we noticed the missing farm laborers in the many fields we passed, signaling a coming food crisis. Scarcity will lead to a continued rise in food prices. Tariffs will exasperate the situation. What’s heading our way, will not be pleasant for most Americans. But beyond food becoming scarcer and more expensive, we realized that we’ll be expected to pay for other needs and services our federal tax dollars once covered.
The radio was tuned in to KCLU, a public radio station that we rely on for local news, public interest stories, and information. They do a great job reporting during wildfires or other situations that arise in our area. The general manager, a former colleague, came on and informed the listeners that the station would be losing $300,000 in federal funding as part of the government’s cuts to NPR and PBS. She was relying on us, the general public, to increase our donations to fully cover the shortfall so that she didn’t have to lay people off and so that they could continue to deliver the news.
I was livid. KCLU serves a wealthy community, so I know it will survive. But what of rural and poor areas? Many people will lose access to public radio that serves to provide them with important news and information, especially during disasters. The shortsighted decision-making of this president and the Republican led Congress is destroying our country and using our tax dollars to do it. They are funding unnecessary tax breaks for the wealthy, stupid military parades, excessive golf trips for the president, ruthless ICE agents, marines and national guards recking havoc in our streets, building concentration camps, and defending lawsuits against unconstitutional executive orders.
As Congress begins to defund essentials like food stamps for the poor, scientific and medical research, national parks, foreign aid, healthcare, disaster relief, education, infrastructure, and public broadcasting, who is expected to foot the bill for these essentials? Or do we simply allow people to starve to death, to die of treatable and preventable illnesses, to remain unhoused after a natural disaster, to drive on unsafe highways, to be forced out of nursing homes, to lack access to clean air and water, and to forego adequate education?
Perhaps they believe individual states will foot the bills for the needs of their population. Perhaps they believe churches will feed, clothe, and house the impoverished. Perhaps they believe families or friends will care former nursing home patients. Perhaps they believe individuals or corporations will donate to research they care about. Perhaps they believe the public will pay through donations, not taxes, for public broadcasting. Perhaps they believe on the rich deserve to educate their children. Perhaps they believe clean water and clean air are a privilege and not a right. Perhaps they think climate change is a hoax and weather forecasts aren’t necessary. Perhaps they think people will stop rebuilding in disaster prone areas as insurance becomes unavailable (or unaffordable) and FEMA no longer exists. Perhaps they believe that if people have to pay for their own medical bills out of pocket, they will take better care of their health, just remain sick, and the costs will eventually come down.
Whether they are right or wrong about any of this, the reality is that millionaires and billionaires are benefitting most from federal tax breaks. To compensate for the loss of federal dollars, state taxes are likely to increase to cover the cost of just about everything people need or people will start to pay out of pocket for just about everything that used to be part of the “general welfare” like health, research, education, and disaster relief. I’m on the fence about increasing my donations to cover what I believe our tax dollars should cover for the public good. These cuts will push most people into survival mode, not the mindset needed to invest nor innovate. Frankly, I might need those dollars to cover the basics like food, housing, energy, insurance, medical expenses and education for my grandchildren in the coming years as things fall apart.
Right now, California is a donor state. This means that we collect more in federal tax dollars than we get in funding. This past year we donated $83 million. I wish there was a way for us to keep those dollars here in California so that we could better fund our own healthcare, disaster relief, education, research, infrastructure, public broadcasting, and food assistance. If not, then perhaps California could institute a reasonable “wealth tax” to reassign the federal tax savings millionaires and billionaires are getting from the federal government under this Republican Congress. Perhaps the rich will realize that funding these things actually helps keep them safe and in fact grows our collective economy. California is already the fourth largest economy in the world. Let’s keep it that way and do even better.
I have no idea what these poor red states are going to do. And frankly, I only care because they are human beings. But it bothers me that they keep electing Republican lawmakers who cut everything safety net they rely on for survival. It’s shortsighted to believe people won’t revolt when they become desperate enough. They won’t just “get over it” as Mitch McConnell commented about the cuts. Maybe folks in red states believe in this way of doing things. So, I can only hope that it works out for them. But I don’t want to live that way. I prefer that my tax dollars go to promote the general welfare so that we feel secure and innovative enough to create a stronger, healthier, and better future for our children’s children.