I’m not adverse to conflict. In fact, I enjoy a good debate on significant topics. My late brother and I often argued for the fun of it at family gatherings. Outside guests had to be told that our loud debate was not vitriolic, although the topic was always serious. Now a particular son-in-law fills the void my brother left after he passed away. However, I’m rarely the one to pick a fight. But admittedly, I rarely shy away from a fight worth having.
When I was a young woman, my mother taught me to pick my fights carefully. Some issues are simply worth letting go while others deserve my attention. I think about the consequences of allowing an issue to pass without serious input. I ask myself if the opinion being proffered should be allowed to linger and travel throughout society unchallenged. If the answer is no, then I’m going to engage. For example, I can’t pass up a vaccine debate. To the chagrin of some of my fellow educators, I won’t argue the merits of public over private schools. The most recent ongoing debates my son-in-law and I have are about the necessity of rules, laws and regulations. He views them as not only unnecessary, but actual impediments to his freedom and to a free market. I view them as necessary protections against exploitation and chaos.
Lately, our country has been embroiled in arguments over the role of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Most who argue against it seem to mischaracterize it altogether. They contend that the country has been handing over positions to women and people of color simply because they are women or people of color. That isn’t true. They don’t appreciate that DEI is simply about opening previously closed opportunities to women and people of color who are qualified for these positions.
Too many Americans fail to acknowledge that white men who previously secured these coveted positions, often got them based primarily on friendships, sponsorships, connections, and kinships despite their lack of actual qualifications. I’m convinced that having a black president was a huge wake- up call for many that the days of white male hegemony were coming to an end. Republicans soon realized that the DEI policies that allowed Barack Obama to thrive were a threat to their future finances, power, and status because these policies required them to compete with people who prepared hard to gain the education, expertise and experience that qualifies them for positions of influence. Years of entitlement made them lazy and complacent and unable to compete with the likes of Barack Obama, and they worried for those coming up behind him. It was worrisome to see that their mediocrity and connections were no longer enough to propel them forward in a country they claimed ownership of and where they saw themselves as the rightful rulers.
So, they picked a fight that I always knew was coming. The first blow was electing Donald Trump instead of Hillary Clinton, even though on every metric she was far more qualified than he was. Whenever I hear someone say that DEI went too far, I recognize that their argument is rooted in a mythology of white male supremacy that is subconsciously difficult for many people to abandon. DEI did not go too far. No one was hiring unqualified people to fly planes, become doctors, teachers, scientists, firemen, lawyers, or corporate executives. If anything, the people who were hired were beyond qualified for the position and had overcome extraordinary obstacles to rise to their positions. They had to overcome teachers who said girls shouldn’t and children of color can’t. They had to continually overcome stereotypes and prejudices by repeatedly proving their excellence. They were never given the benefit of the doubt like their white male peers. Through the years they developed resilience, defiance, and a very thick skin that drove them to dare to apply for positions that had been previously closed to them.
The fact that white Americans refuse to acknowledge the reality that women and people of color came to positions based on merit, and worse, continue to believe that they couldn’t possibly possess the merit in the first place is a disgusting legacy of the white supremacy this country was founded on. So, now, out of rebellion, the white backlash has returned us to that old system of cronyism where money, connections and loyalty secure positions of power and influence. An incompetent degenerate like Donald Trump is the president. We see a ridiculous person like Pete Hegseth running our military and an entire Cabinet of unqualified clowns making bad decisions and corrupting our rule of law. Their lack of education, experience, expertise, morality, and commonsense has brought us to the brink of disaster.
Without much foresight, this Administration picked a fight with our news media. They picked a fight with government workers. They picked a fight with our former allies. They picked a fight with immigrants. They picked a fight with women and minorities. They picked a fight with the environment. They picked a fight with the Constitution and the rule of law. They picked a fight with Iran. And now this President and several of his Cabinet members have picked a fight with the Pope. These are fights they cannot and should not win for the sake of the world. The good news is that people of conscious are fighting back in courts, on social media, and in the streets because they recognize, as I do, that some fights are worth having.
